ABSTRACT
Substance abuse (SA) disproportionately impacts underserved communities, more so in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Though recent studies have demonstrated minimal impact on long-term survival for recipients of hearts from SA donors (SADs), there is a paucity of work on the societal implications of where and in whom such hearts are transplanted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate regional and socioeconomic factors of patients receiving hearts from alcohol and cocaine-using donors. We evaluated the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry for adult heart transplant recipients (HTX-R) from 2010 to 2022. Donors were grouped by heavy alcohol use, cocaine use, both, or neither. Survival analysis assessed the effect of donor SA, recipient work status and residence adjusting for demographics. Among 24,445 HTX-R, donor SA was unassociated with mortality, but living in the South increased risk (HR=1.22;1.12-1.33) as did Black race and older age (donors and recipients). Higher education and working at listing were protective. Additional post hoc models found no interaction between HTX-R Black race and donor SA or HTX-R South residence and donor SA. Donor alcohol and cocaine abuse, both separately and used in conjunction, did not impact overall mortality of heart transplant recipients. Though positive indicators of increased socioeconomic status (higher education and work status) did appear protective, and while living in the South did have a negative impact on HTx survival, these factors appear to be independent of receiving hearts from SADs. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: During the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple treatment options have been investigated, even though their efficacy and secondary effects remain insufficiently known. We report the case of a vitamin C induced oxalate nephropathy in a COVID-19 patient with preexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD) resulting in irreversible acute renal failure. Vitamin C, also known as ascorbic acid, has been used as an anti-inflammatory therapy for COVID-19, but review of the literature shows similar cases of acute kidney injury (AKI), raising concern. METHOD: We report the case of a 73-year-old Caucasian woman admitted for hyperthermia and digestive disorders. She had recently started a first-line chemotherapy for multiple myeloma with partial response. She also displayed preexisting stage 4 CKD (eGFR 18.50 mL/min/1.73 m2 using CKD-EPI) of unknown aetiology. She was tested positive for SARS-CoV2 by nasopharyngeal swab and soon transferred to the intensive care unit. She received intravenous corticosteroids using dexamethasone 6 g/24 h for 10 days and a piperacillin + tazobactam probabilistic antibiotherapy. She also received high doses (15 g/24 h) of vitamin C for three consecutive days. No monoclonal antibodies were prescribed due to a previous vaccination with a positive serology upon admission. Although the patient recovered from respiratory tract infection, her kidney function progressively deteriorated with serum creatinine levels rising up to 8.06 g/dL, leading to her admission in our nephrology department. The patient was initially treated with high doses of diuretics for anasarca and an abdominal CT excluded urinary tract obstruction with normal kidney size and aspect. Urinary analysis showed protein to creatinine (p/c) ratio of 1348 g/g, and presence of urinary light chains. Her monoclonal spike was measured at 2.3 g/L and her kappa/lambda fraction was 1.74. Intermittent haemodialysis was initiated, and a kidney biopsy was performed. RESULTS: Histology revealed hundreds of intratubular calcium oxalate crystals, with severe and diffuse acute tubular necrosis and interstitial edema. There was no amyloidosis, no sign of active glomerular disease and no interstitial fibrosis. Immunofluorescence (IgA, IgG, IgM, C1Q, C3, kappa and lambda) was negative. We concluded to oxalate nephropathy. After a 2-month follow-up, the patient remains dialysis dependent. Vitamin C is a precursor of oxalate and has been shown to cause secondary oxaluria, particularly with high-dose regimens in patients with altered renal function. Given the histological findings evocative of acute oxalate nephropathy, the accountability of high doses of vitamin C should be considered. No other cause of hyperoxaluria was identified in our patient beside broad spectrum antibiotic use, which could decrease intestinal bacterial oxalate degradation. In particular, there was no malabsorption The limitation of our report is the unknown cause of preexisting CKD;therefore, we cannot rule out preexisting hyperoxaluria. Also, no dosage of serum vitamin C and oxalate levels were performed during follow-up. Finally, our patient had other possible causes AKI, such as recent SARS-CoV2 infection, or linked to multiple myeloma, but these were considered unlikely given the proper haematological response to treatment and non-evocative biopsy. The rationale for vitamin C use in COVID-19 is based on in vitro studies showing its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant and immune modulatory properties. There lack large clinical studies, and the literature shows conflicting results. Multiple cases of acute oxalate nephropathy were described. CONCLUSION: Vitamin C is an anti-inflammatory treatment used in COVID-19 that can lead to secondary hyperoxaluria with significant and irreversible AKI. Due to the severity of AKI in patients with preexisting CKD, we believe renal function should be considered before using high doses of vitamin C. Larger controlled trials are needed both to establish the clinical benefit of vitamin C and further describe its potential ephrotoxicity.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The impact of the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave on cancer patient management was measured within the nationwide network of the Unicancer comprehensive cancer centers in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The number of patients diagnosed and treated within 17 of the 18 Unicancer centers was collected in 2020 and compared with that during the same periods between 2016 and 2019. Unicancer centers treat close to 20% of cancer patients in France yearly. The reduction in the number of patients attending the Unicancer centers was analyzed per regions and cancer types. The impact of delayed care on cancer-related deaths was calculated based on different hypotheses. RESULTS: A 6.8% decrease in patients managed within Unicancer in the first 7 months of 2020 versus 2019 was observed. This reduction reached 21% during April and May, and was not compensated in June and July, nor later until November 2020. This reduction was observed only for newly diagnosed patients, while the clinical activity for previously diagnosed patients increased by 4% similar to previous years. The reduction was more pronounced in women, in breast and prostate cancers, and for patients without metastasis. Using an estimated hazard ratio of 1.06 per month of delay in diagnosis and treatment of new patients, we calculated that the delays observed in the 5-month period from March to July 2020 may result in an excess mortality due to cancer of 1000-6000 patients in coming years. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the delays in cancer patient management were observed only for newly diagnosed patients, more frequently in women, for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and nonmetastatic cancers. These delays may result is an excess risk of cancer-related deaths in the coming years.